The surprise incredulous that can produce the fact that people no longer have a private life or, more specifically, the boundaries between public and private space are becoming increasingly blurred, it is something truly modern and, therefore, romantic. From an analytical standpoint, the fact that there are people still surprised by this derivation of behavior is just another sign of cultural backwardness, social and intellectual, as the company gets this for about 4 or 5 years quite peculiar coinciding with what was called "recession" referring the bursting of the housing bubble.
Western society lives immersed in a constant process of cultural recession, in which sentimentality and nostalgia for the past supposedly better soup has become an aesthetic, ideological and cultural, in which people are not able to see more beyond their own noses. Unless you force them to see what interests you. Hence comes, in many cases, success or failure of any proposals and productions, both on television and in movies, music, theater, sometimes the art.
Marketing is the ultimate tool to bring something to the public, although it somewhat is of poor quality, always talking in terms of aesthetic experience or appreciative values \u200b\u200bmore typical of the past, if not remote. On a personal note that I have been forced to rate products clearly "mediocrizados", like most film franchises, which now seem endless, and whose sole purpose is the profitability of the box office. Money, as always.
other hand, the concept of personal privacy, leaving aside the factor "show = Entertainment", is intimately linked to technological development, but above all, the term postmodernism, usually designating a large number artistic movements, cultural, literary and philosophical twentieth century, defined in varying degree and manner of their opposition or over-modern. For a modern adult was unthinkable a few years writing on the Internet, either in a photoblog or a social networking site like Facebook or MySpace, images belong to the realm of privacy. For a modern adult strange, uncomfortable and disturbing scenes share the record of their daily lives with strangers. To their way of conceiving the world and privacy, the photos should not leave the private sphere: they are part of it and might even consider pillars. Publicizing the photos implies some violation the spirit, say classical, photography and privacy.
However, the concept seems to be another youth. A rate of three thousand per minute, the photos are posted on sites like Flickr generated in the field of cyberspace not only a vast territory of images, but at the same time, upsetting entrenched concepts of privacy. We could point, as a hypothesis, that from this type of outsourcing, the territory and the nature of privacy has changed. For these generations of privacy in modern design has been reduced, and their coverage is becoming less or at least different.
One of the biggest problems in dealing with this issue is precisely to arrive at a concept or precise definition of what postmodernism. The difficulty of this task involves several factors, including the main drawbacks are present, and therefore the scarcity and imprecision of the data to analyze, but you can define the set as a system lacking a whole, an order , a unit ultimately consistency.
All this combination of factors leads to this turbulent period we live in that while technological developments are achieved important clinical and abysmal, he praises the attitude of a group of gentlemen and ladies who lunch in a TV studio broadcast the live program, speaking by telephone while the image AUPAN popularly known as "poligonera" example of vulgarity, ignorance, vices and superstitions that are named in the proposed work, the undisputed benchmark for a generation that is lost, and whose stimuli (mainly visual) are nothing more than a set of fireworks without substance or form, just have lots of color and make much noise. We used to what it is digested easily and directly, passively, directly affecting the everyday thinking, confusing the staff, with not quite know what to order.
My hypothesis is given, of course, hand in hand of consumer capitalism, which has not kept pace with the stimuli to which we are exposed every day, so that world leaders are forced to bind the machine of progress that they gave birth to backtrack, preventing progress, for example, the file streaming via the Web. The clear example in Spain we see with Sinde Act, which hide behind intellectual property rights, what really stands for is the entertainment industry and factory owners of CD, DVD s, s, with the impact of digital development would be forced to abandon this practice, on the other hand does nothing but destroy the planet's natural resources fairly idiot.
Too many people live in "Big Brother" and various media personalities to allow the population is bored with the consumption of privacy and turn the page, something from my point of view clearly desirable. We face a new problem, simply extends an existing one. And that for someone looking for a real and tangible progress, like me, is boring.
My solution is absolute ignorance. People to assume fully what this show is simplistic and numbing, get bored of it and ignore it. Full stop.
0 comments:
Post a Comment